No. 19-7918
Patrick Harris v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553a child-pornography criminal-sentencing district-court enhancement-factors excessive-sentence sentencing-discretion sentencing-enhancements sentencing-guidelines statutory-considerations
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR WHEN IT FOUND ENHANCEMENT FACTORS LISTED IN U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(6) AND (b)(7)(D) APPROPRIATE IN MR. HARRIS' CASE?
II. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY SENTENCING MR. HARRIS EXCESSIVELY IN LIGHT OF THE STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONS IN 18 U.S.C. §3553(a)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court err in applying sentencing enhancements under U.S.S.G. §2G2.2(b)(2), (b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(6) and (b)(7)(D) to Mr. Harris' case?
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Patrick Harris
Manuel Benjamin Russ — Manuel B. Russ, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent