Whether a condition of supervised release requiring a defendant to participate in sex offender treatment that may include polygraph examinations violates the Fifth Amendment where the condition explicitly makes any refusal to submit to the polygraph examination a violation of supervised release creating a classic penalty situation in contravention to this Court's holding in Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984)?

Put another way, whether a valid invocation of the right to remain silent will result in an automatic violation of a supervisee's supervised release?

Whether a condition of supervised release requiring a defendant to participate in sex offender treatment that may include polygraph examinations violates the Fifth Amendment