No. 19-7894

In Re Charles S. Renchenski

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-review habeas-corpus procedural-default statutory-adequacy statutory-interpretation statutory-notice writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-04-03
Question Presented (from Petition)

DID THE FEDERAL COURT(S) UNLAWFULLY SUSPEND THE WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS
BY
RENDERING DECISIONS CONTRARY TO THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT RELATING TO: (A) - THE ADEQUACY REQUIREMENT OF A
STATUTE; (B) - THE NOTICE REQUIREMNENT OF A STATUTE; (C) - PROCEDURAL
DEFAULT; AND (D) - AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING, BY DENYING MR. RENCHENSKI
FEDERAL REVIEW?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the federal court(s) unlawfully suspend the writ of habeas corpus?

Docket Entries

2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent Clearfield County District Attorney's Office to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-02-07
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Charles S. Renchenski
Charles S. Renchenski — Petitioner
Clearfield County District Attorney's Office
Leanne Ruth Nedza — Clearfield County District Attorney's Office, Respondent