I. Did an unconstitutional "objective risk of bias," Williams v. Pennsylvania, 136 S. Ct. 1899, 1905 (2016), or "probability of actual bias on the part of the judge," Rippo v. Baker, 137 S. Ct. 905, 907 (2017), manifest itself during the sentencing hearing, in which the judge said someone like petitioner should "be eliminated from the world" and the guideline range "shock[ed] the conscience," and then imposed a sentence almost five times longer than the guideline maximum?

Did an unconstitutional 'objective risk of bias' or 'probability of actual bias on the part of the judge' manifest itself during the sentencing hearing?