No. 19-7861
Sean P. Reilly v. Florida, et al.
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 actual-innocence constitutional-claims federal-habeas-review habeas-corpus in-custody in-custody-requirement lackawanna-county-v-cross schlup-v-delo witness-tampering
Latest Conference:
2020-05-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the "actual innocence" gateway to federal habeas review applied in Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 115 S. Ct. 851, 130 L. Ed. 2d 808 (1995), and further explained in dicta in Lackawanna allows a federal habeas petitioner to overcome the "in custody" requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254?
Whether the adverse affect exception explained in dicta in Lackawanna allows a federal habeas petitioner to overcome the "in custody" requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'actual innocence' gateway to federal habeas review allows a federal habeas petitioner to overcome the 'in custody' requirement
Docket Entries
2020-05-04
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Sean Reilly
Sean Patrick. Reilly — Petitioner