I. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT HELD THAT IT DID NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO REVIEW THE DISTRICT COURT'S DENIAL TO GRANT MARTINEZ-ALVARADO'S REQUEST FOR A DOWNWARD DEPARTURE PURSUANT TO U.S.S.G. §4A1.3

II. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED THE DISTRICT COURT'S DENIAL OF MARTINEZ-ALVARADO'S REQUEST FOR HIS SENTENCES TO RUN CONCURRENTLY INSTEAD OF CONSECUTIVELY.

III. WHETHER CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED MARTINEZ-ALVARADO'S SENTENCES THAT WERE NOT SUBSTANTIVELY REASONABLE CONSIDERING 18 U.S.C. §3553(A)-(F).

Whether certiorari review should be granted where the Eleventh Circuit held that it did not have jurisdiction to review the district court's denial to grant Martinez-Alvarado's request for a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. §4A1.3