1) Under the standards set by this Court in Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309
(2012), must a U.S. District Court allow evidentiary development of a factbased claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, if the state courts
have failed to do so?

2) When a state regulates claims of constitutional entitlement to its collateral
review venue, does it violate a Defendant 's Fourteenth Amendment due process
rights when it fails to allow development of those claims in the state courts?

Under the standards set by this Court in Martinez v. Ryan, must a U.S. District Court allow evidentiary development of a fact-based claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, if the state courts have failed to do so?