No. 19-7815

Robert Grimsley v. Oregon, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights contractual-leniency custody due-process fraud fraud-in-the-facts habeas-corpus prison prison-contracts prisoner-rights sentencing sentencing-guidelines state-court state-court-judgment statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference: 2020-05-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Can a state commit the crimes of fraud in the facta of its own Sentencing guidelines to renege on prison contracts

How can there be Habas Corpus relief whetrma writ of Habeas is on " behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state caurt," pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 2254 (b) ? I.E. Since the states frand in the facta contractual renege 'We The Inmates' are not incarcerated pursuant to a state court.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a state commit the crimes of fraud in the facts of its own sentencing guidelines to renege on prison contracts on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court

Docket Entries

2020-05-04
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2019-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2020)

Attorneys

Robert Grimsley
Robert Grimsley — Petitioner