Dale W. Eaton v. Mike Pacheco, Warden
1. WHETHER A STATE COURT HAS ADJUDICATED THE PERFORMANCE PRONG OF A STRICKLAND V. WASHINGTON CLAIM ON THE MERITS WITHIN THE MEANING OF 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) WHEN THE HABEAS PETITIONER ALLEGES DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE DEFICIENCIES SUPPORTED BY NEW EVIDENCE THAT FUNDAMENTALLY ALTERS THE CLAIM THAT WAS PRESENTED TO THE STATE COURT?
2. WHETHER 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) (2) IS TRIGGERED BY UNFAIR STATE COURT FACT-FINDING PROCEDURES?
3. WHETHER THE APPROPRIATE STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR A FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION IS WAIVABLE BY THE PETITIONER.
Whether a state court has adjudicated the performance prong of a Strickland v. Washington claim on the merits within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) when the habeas petitioner alleges different performance deficiencies supported by new evidence that fundamentally alters the claim that was presented to the state court?