No. 19-7806
Cherunda Lynn Fox v. United States Postal Service, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment attorney-general civil-procedure default-judgment due-process electronic-case-filing equal-protection federal-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure service-of-process
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the defendants were served on 3-19-18 as verified by the court record, the Judge and receipt personally verified by the Attorney General, defaulted this case in plaintiffs favor 5-18-18.
Whether the 3 methods of service required, the Clerk's written instructions, Electronic Case Filing (ECF) and FedRCivP4 are in violation of the 14th Am due process and equal protection clauses of the law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the defendants were served on 3-19-18 as verified by the court record, the Judge and receipt - personally verified by the Attorney General, defaulted this case in plaintiff's favor 5-18-18
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-03-17
Waiver of right of respondent USPS to respond filed.
2020-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Cherunda Lynn Fox
Cherunda Lynn Fox — Petitioner
USPS
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent