No. 19-7779

Freddy Garcia v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2020-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process due-process,criminal-procedure,constitutional-erro harmless-error indictment indictment-variance jury-conviction jury-trial standard-of-review
Latest Conference: 2020-04-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

A jury convicted Freddy Garcia for a felony arising from a different incident than the one for which he was indicted. The State gave no pretrial notice of its intent to present the unindicted incident to the jury ; not even as a potential extraneous offense. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals found this to be constitutional error, but harmless beyond a reasonable doubt .

1. When a defendant is convicted of a n offense for which he was not indicted , and has preserved the issues of constitutional error, what factors should a reviewing court consider when determinin g whether the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a defendant is convicted of an offense for which he was not indicted, and has preserved the issues of constitutional error, what factors should a reviewing court consider when determining whether the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?

Docket Entries

2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)

Attorneys

Freddy Garcia
Cheri Lynn DuncanHarris County Public Defender's Office, Petitioner