No. 19-7777
John Henry Hoyle v. West Virginia
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-conviction due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction question-not-identified sexual-offender-registration standing statutory-interpretation takings telephone-disclosure void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is West Virginia's sexual offender registration scheme, which requires the disclosure of any telephone number that a registrant "has" or "uses," unconstitutionally void for vagueness, so as to require the reversal of the Petitioner's convictions?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent State of West Virginia to respond filed.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)
Attorneys
John Henry Hoyle
Jeremy Benjamin Cooper — Blackwater Law PLLC, Petitioner
State of West Virginia
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent