(1)
WHETHER THE PRE-TRIAL ACTS AND OMISSIONS MADE BY MARCUS WILLIAMS' COUNSEL, ALLIED WITH FAILURE
TO OBJECT ON THE RECORD, TO PRE-ARRAIGNMENT ERRORS MADE BY THE DISTRICT COURT, FAILURE TO
SUBJECT THE GOVERNMENTS CASE TO STRICT ADVERSARIAL TESTING AND APPELLATE COUNSEL'S
DERELICTION IN RAISING COGNIZABLE APPELLATE ISSUES, CONSTITUTED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF
COUNSEL, BORDERING ON CONSTRUCTIVE DENIAL OF COUNSEL, A STRUCTURAL ERROR.

(2)
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND RULE 11 VIOLATIONS MAY HAVE RENDERED MARCUS
WILLIAMS PLEA AGREEMENT INVOLUNTARY, UNKNOWING OWING AND UNINTELLIGENTLY MADE, BY R EASON OF
DECEPTION PERPETUATED BY COUNSEL AND FAILURE E OF THE COURT, THE GOVERNMENT, COUNSEL. TO
ENDURE PETITIONER WAS ENTITLED TO RELIEF.

Whether the pre-trial acts and omissions made by Marcus Williams' counsel constituted ineffective assistance of counsel