No. 19-7752
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation custody due-process eleventh-circuit fifth-amendment miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona pre-miranda-questioning public-safety-exception self-incrimination
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Mr. Ochoa's Fifth Amendment rights were violated when the
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found that the public-safety-exception to this
Court's general rule in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 460-61 (1966) justified
pre-Miranda questioning of Mr. Ochoa who was in custody when he was questioned?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Ochoa's Fifth Amendment rights were violated
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2020)
2020-01-22
Application (19A811) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 22, 2020.
2020-01-16
Application (19A811) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 23, 2020 to March 23, 2020, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Daniel Ochoa
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent