No. 19-775
Response Waived
Tags: access-to-courts appeal appeal-rights bias constitution constitutional-rights due-process due-process-clause-of-the-14th-amendment equal-protection federal-court foreign-litigant judicial-bias prejudice pro-se-litigant pro-se-representation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Federal court has the right based on an obvious prejudice and bias to refuse due process to a foreign pro se litigant. The denial is so obvious, persistent and omnipresent in this case that this court must correct this quickly to have still a meaningful constitution as the rights denied to the foreign pro se litigant are constitutional in nature: due process, right to appeal, etc.?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal court has the right based on an obvious prejudice and bias to refuse due process to a foreign pro se litigant
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-13
Waiver of right of respondents TradingScreen Inc., Pierre Schroeder, Piero Grandi to respond filed.
2019-12-13
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due January 16, 2020)
Attorneys
In Re Philippe Buhannic
Philippe Buhannic — Petitioner
TradingScreen Inc., Pierre Schroeder, Piero Grandi
Peter Curtis Neger — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent
John M. Vassos — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent