No. 19-771
Gerald Sensabaugh v. Kimberly Halliburton, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights common-law due-process first-amendment free-speech personnel-file protected-speech public-employee qualified-immunity retaliation standing takings
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Court should reconsider its qualified immunity jurisprudence to accord with the official's burden of establishing immunity entitlement at common law in 1871.
2. Whether placing a guidance letter in a public employee's personnel file would chill further protected speech.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should reconsider its qualified-immunity jurisprudence to accord with the official's burden of establishing immunity entitlement at common-law in 1871
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-12-27
Waiver of right of respondents Kimber Halliburton, in her official capacity and the Washington County Board of Education to respond filed.
2019-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Gerald Sensabaugh
Alan L. Cates — Husch Blackwell LLP, Petitioner
Kimber Halliburton, in her official capacity and the Washington County Board of Education
Kent Erickson Herrin — Herrin, Booze, et al., Respondent