(1) Will this court overturn, 9th circuit 's: case No. 18-56048 -11/12/2019 dkt No. 49 final Order 's:
Denial of PROVEN Fraud on District Court and Denial of Mr. Kerns ' REQUEST for court to Grant Mr. Kerns
Judgement by Default of his demand amount? Because: No LEGAL Certificate of Service; EXIST, regarding:
Answer to U. S. District court 's case no. 3:16-cv-02438 09/28/16 Dkt No 1; Complaint So: Will this Court Honor
U. S. District court 's case no. 3:16-cv-02438 09/28/16 Dkt No. 2; Summons: by Granting Judgement by Default
to Kerns; Fed. Rule 55(b) (2). See [Case: 18-56048,09/24/19, ID: 11442153, DktEntry: 46, Poses 43 thru 60]

(2) Will this court Rule: all defence in this case; is a Trespasser on the Court, and Void; due to Fraud on court?

(3) Will this court Overturn: U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case Number 18-56048: dkt. No.:
35 Memorandum; Affirming : U. S. District Court; Southern District of CA (San Diego 's): case # 3:16-cv-02438;
07/24/2018 Dkt No. 208 ORDER; Granting Summery Judgment to Mr. Wenner?

(a) District Court; 208 Order; is the result of: Fraud on the U. S. District Court, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding
and Abetting, Bias, Abuse of Power, and Violations of Mr. Kerns ' Constitutional Civil Rights: that Mr. Kerns
Reported by Mail, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 's, Chief Judge Sidney Thomas;
and was Officially entered on the 9th Circuit 's Docket; (dkt no. 46); by the court 2 - 3 days after Kerns mailed it

(b) The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 07/24/2019 - Docket Number 35; Memorandum 's
conclusions: Demonstrate, Fraud on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Plus: knowingly
Counterfeiting: a new cause of action to Replace the Causes of Action on Mr. Kerns ' Actual Complaint

(c) Fraud on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit By: Judge William Q. Hayes,
Judge William V. Gallo, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP , and their Attorney Robert Anderson;
for (Fraudulently) portraying Mr. Kerns: as an ERISA Participant: after Truthfully stating, in The same
documents; that Mr. Kerns was paid Pension benefits; retroactive to October 2003; which Proves Mr. Kerns
Officially Retired In 2003, and has not been a Participant since.

(d) Mr. Kerns Did Provide;

Will this court overturn the 9th circuit's denial of proven fraud on the district court and denial of Mr. Kerns' request for judgment by default?