The fact, issues, and evidence related to a juvenile lifer's decertification (Transfer) decision are relevant to said Juvenile Lifer's Resentencing. The decertification (Transfer) decision presents the Sentencing option of light sentence as a Juvenile and an entirely long sentence as an adult, see, Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012); Alleyne v. U.S. (133 S.Ct. 2151 (2013); Com v. Munday, 7E A.3d 661 (Pa. Super. 2013).

DID UNSUPPORTED DECERTIFICATION RENDER PETITIONER'S SENTENCE AND CONVICTION UNCONSTITUTIONAL SENTENCE, RATHER APPEARS.

DID COURT ERR IN APPOINTING PETITIONER TO MAKE DIAGNOSIS APPOINTED SPECIALIST WASN'T QUALIFIED TO DO, THUS FAILING TO ADDRESS PETITIONER'S POSSIBLE AND/OR ACTUAL REHABILITATIVE NEEDS?

DID COURT ERR/ABUSE ITS DISCRETION AT JUVENILE LIFER RESENTENCING HEARING BY FAILING TO ALLOW PETITIONER TO ADDRESS/CORRECT FALSE AND MISLEADING DOCUMENTS/AVERMENTS MADE AGAINST PETITIONER BY PETITIONER'S ATTORNEY AND PROSECUTION IN THEIR SENTENCING MEMORANDUMS?

DID MITIGATION SPECIALIST ERR AND PREJUDICE PETITIONER BY PROVIDING INCOMPLETE EVALUATION AND REPORT WITH FALSE/MISLEADING INFORMATION AND GIVEN UNDER MEANING WEAK TESTIMONY?

DID COURT REPORTER ERR IN OMITTING PORTIONS OF RESENTENCING HEARING TRANSCRIPT FOR CERTIFICATION?

DID EVIDENCE SUPPORT A SENTENCE OR CONVICTION ON FELONY MURDER, ROBBERY AND CONSPIRACY TO ROBBERY?

Whether the issues and evidence related to a juvenile offender's decertification (transfer) decision are relevant to the juvenile offender's resentencing