No. 19-7672
Donte Deshawn Alston v. United States
Relisted (4)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts due-process eleventh-circuit habeas habeas-corpus prior-panel-precedent prior-precedent-rule pro-se second-or-successive
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the Eleventh Circuit's Prior-Precedent Rule violates due process when the precedent is based on a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 application usually filed pro se, that must be decided without meaningful briefing, without a record, without oral argument and within 30 days of filing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit's Prior-Precedent Rule violates due process
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, respecting the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in St. Hubert v. United States, 590 U. S. ___ (2020) (Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari).
2020-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-26
Rescheduled.
2020-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-19
Rescheduled.
2020-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-05-11
Rescheduled.
2020-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-29
Reply of petitioner Donte Deshawn Alston filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-10
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-03-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 15, 2020.
2020-03-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 16, 2020 to April 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Donte Deshawn Alston
Vionnette Reyes Johnson — Federal Defender Program, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent