I.) Whether counsel was ineffective for not pursuing all the way
through the appeal stages, the government's statement during
closing arguments that it should convict Petitioner if there
were no facts to support the defenses theory of this case?

II.) Whether defense failed to object to the government's closing
arguments?

III.) Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to apply the
proper guidelines to Petitioner's thirty (30) year sentence?

IV.) Whether counsel was ineffective for not acquiring the sealed
records and compeling, regarding the sealed records?

V.) Whether counsel was ineffective for not allowing the Petitioner
to see a sworn in jury?

VI.) Whether counsel was ineffective for not providing the govern
ment unfactual evidence of Petitioner's and Mrs. Little's relationship?

Whether counsel was ineffective for not pursuing all the way through the appeal stages, the government's statement during closing arguments that it should convict Petitioner if there were no facts to support the defenses theory of this case?