No. 19-7651
Craig Keyon White v. Robert Fox, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process eyewitness-identification ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Whether the unduly suggestive pretrial identification procedure and resulting unreliable identifications admitted against White at his criminal trial violated White's right to due process?
(2) Whether White's Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated by his trial counsel's failure to effectively challenge the eyewitness identifications admitted to prove White's guilt?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unduly suggestive pretrial identification procedure and resulting unreliable identifications admitted against White at his criminal trial violated White's right to due process?
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Fox to respond filed.
2020-02-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Craig White
Tracy Casadio — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Robert Fox