1. WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD ACCEPT AND DECIDE THIS CASE THAT AFFECTS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF INDIVIDUALS, VIRTUALLY EVERYONE WHO APPLIES FOR CREDIT TO BUY A HOUSE, LEASE AN APARTMENT, BUY OR LEASE A CAR, APPLY FOR A CREDIT CARD AND DEPEND UPON THE ACCURACY OF THE CREDIT RATING ENTITIES TO PROVIDE ACCURATE REPORTS AND SCORES?

2. WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD ACCEPT THIS CASE BECAUSE, CONTRARY TO THREE THIRD CIRCUIT CASES AGAINST TRANSUNION DIRECTLY ON POINT AS WELL AS FOURTH, FIFTH, AND D.C. CIRCUIT CASES, THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DECIDED AND A THIRD CIRCUIT PANEL AFFIRMED THAT ONLY CONSUMER REPORTS AND SCORES (SUPPLIED TO INDIVIDUALS SEEKING CREDIT) AND NOT CREDITOR CUSTOMER REPORTS AND SCORES (PROVIDED FOR A FEE TO ENTITIES THAT EXTEND OR DENY CREDIT) ARE TO BE CONSIDERED FOR ACCURACY AND CONFORMITY TO THE FCRA?

3. WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD REQUIRE THAT THE CREDIT RATING ENTITIES PROVIDE IN THEIR CONSUMER REPORTS AND SCORES AND CREDITOR CUSTOMER REPORTS AND SCORES THE KEY FACTORS (ALGORITHMS USED) TO DETERMINE CREDIT WORTHINESS OF INDIVIDUALS WHO APPLY FOR CREDIT?

4. WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD ACCEPT THIS CASE TO DECIDE "BAD FAITH" AS A BASIS TO AWARD ATTORNEYS' FEES IN AN FCRA CASE?

Whether the Supreme Court should accept and decide this case that affects hundreds of millions of individuals