No. 19-7610
Luciano Camberos-Villapuda v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: automobile-exception collins-v-virginia curtilage Due-Process exigent-circumstances Expectation-of-Privacy fourth-amendment payton-v-new-york probable-cause Warrantless-Entry warrantless-search
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does "exigent circumstances" needs justification when officers conducted a warrantless entry onto the curtilage unlawfully? And whether a warrantless search of the Expedition that was located onto the curtilage was reasonable under the automobile-exception rule based on Collins v. Virginia?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry onto the curtilage and search of a vehicle under the automobile exception
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Luciano Camberos-Villapuda
Luciano Camberos-Villapuda — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent