1. DOES STATUTORY TOLLING AS DESCRIBED IN 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) AND (D)
PERMIT A PETITIONER 'S DIRECT FILING OF SECOND 28 U.S.C. § 2254 HABEAS
CORPUS PETITION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT?

2. DOES EQUITABLE TOLLING DOCTRINE ANNOUNCED IN HOLLAND v.
FLORIDA , 560 U.S. 631 (2010) APPLY IN 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) ISSUE WHERE
STATE AGENT IMPEDED A PETITIONER 'S FILING OF A FEDERAL
APPLICATION BY COMMITTING EXTRINSIC FRAUD ON THE COURT?

3. DOES STATUTORY TOLLING AS DESCRIBED IN 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) AND (D)
APPLY TO CASE WHERE STATE COURT 'S DEFAULT OF LACK OF SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION CLAIM COMPELLED A PETITIONER 'S FILING OF
ISSUE IN FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PETITION?

Does statutory tolling as described in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) and (D) permit a petitioner's direct filing of second 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court?