No. 19-7593
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights criminal-procedure document-production due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct restitution standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in affirming the District Court's denial of Ms. Yi's Motion for a New Trial, given the Government's substantial violations of its obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) to produce exculpatory evidence in a reasonable manner?
II. Whether Fourth Circuit erred in affirming the District Court's conviction of Ms. Yi where the evidence and record were sufficient as a matter of law to support the District Court's findings about the amount of restitution?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government violated its Brady obligations by producing voluminous documents without identifying one document as Brady material
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent