My question Des roof of) Prison mail Log (2) Prisone declaration oficer who receives DosumentFrom Prisoner for mailing, acknowledementof receivin documents are This 3 SuficienT Evidence To Satisfy The Prison Mailbox Rule Announcedin (HousTon v. Lack 487 U.s. 266, 270(i988) or is not as how Ninth Circuit Announced in This CurrenT Case?

In my Motion For recondideratian dates 7--2019 I Cited Duglas v. Noelle 567 F.3d 11639t −Ci200 n SH0izur v. arey 23 F.3 1220 m Cir 2001 his 2 Cases SupperTed TheacT ThaT Mouson . gek does Anply on circumitances as in my Case. The sacts are basically stated on my Mot reconsiveration Exhibit E). Such Circumstances say That as long as Plaintiff presents as evidence. his own declaraton and his Prison Log Numbers sevealing dite Mail was given To aficer for MailOu it shoul be sufficient For Documents To be Consier Siel eventhagh coments newermake it To CourT.

Question not identified