No. 19-7579
Philip G. Barry v. Thomas Perkins, et ux.
IFP
Tags: automatic-stay bankruptcy-code bankruptcy-courts bankruptcy-jurisdiction bankruptcy-law federal-jurisdiction rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-judgment state-court-judgments void-ab-initio
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the so-called "Rooker-Feldman Doctrine" strips
bankruptcy and other lower federal courts of jurisdiction to
avoid or otherwise declare a state court judgment void ab initio
upon a finding that the state court action was taken in violation
of the United States Bankruptcy Code's Automatic Stay provisions.
(11 U.S.C. §362(a) )
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the so-called 'Rooker-Feldman Doctrine' strips bankruptcy and other lower federal courts of jurisdiction to avoid or otherwise declare a state court judgment void ab initio upon a finding that the state court action was taken in violation of the United States Bankruptcy Code's Automatic Stay provisions (11 U.S.C. §362(a))
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Philip G. Barry
Philip Barry — Petitioner