No. 19-7573
Sean M. Donahue v. Eugene Scalia, Secretary of Labor, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-jurisdiction due-process federal-courts jobs-for-veterans-act standing statutory-enforcement statutory-interpretation veterans-affairs veterans-employment-rights veterans-preference-act void-for-vagueness
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question I. WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM FOR 38 U.S.C. §4215?
Question II. WHAT IS THE NEXT BEST ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM ABSENT THE US DISTRICT COURT?
Question III. SHOULD A STATUTE SHORT OF AN ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM BE STRUCK UNDER THE VOID FOR VAGUENESS DOCTRINE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the appropriate enforcement mechanism for 38 U.S.C. §4215?
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-06
Waiver of right of respondents Scalia, Eugene, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2020)
2020-01-22
Application (19A812) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 15, 2020.
2020-01-10
Application (19A812) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 15, 2020 to March 15, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Scalia, Eugene, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sean M. Donahue
Sean M. Donahue — Petitioner