No. 19-7559

Elijah Jackson, Jr. v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 1st-amendment administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech school-discipline standing statutory-interpretation student-rights
Latest Conference: 2020-04-03
Question Presented (from Petition)

• DOES APPENDIX Q PERSONAL GUARANTOR/SURETY BOND 5-9-2017 SUFFICE TO DEFER FILING FEES?

• DID THE ARTICLE 3 COURT-U. S. DISTRICT COURT-MDF-TD ERROR IN EXECUTION, ISSUANCE OF DOCUMENT 4 FILED 5-17-17 2 PAGES, PAGE ID 87 APPENDIX P? CASE WAS FILED IN 2000 AS 8:2000-CV-01401-SDM.

• DOES APPENDIX O PROMISSORY NOTE AND PERSONAL GUARANTOR/SURETY BOND 6-27-2017 SUFFICE TO DELAY FILING FEES UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. FED. R. APP. P.?

• DOES PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT "PLRA " TITLE 28 U. S. C. SECTION 1915 TRUMP THE 2000 FILING OF CASE #8:2000-CV-01401-SDM. FILED PRIOR TO PLAINTIFF INCARCERATION 1-5-2005? CASE BELOW 2000 AND WAS CLOSED, PRISONER REFILED CASE AS 8:17-CV-01126-JDW-AAS AND 8:17-CV-01294-EAK-MAP.

• DID THE ARTICLE 3 COURT-U. S. DISTRICT COURT-MDF-TD ERROR IN EXECUTION, ISSUANCE OF DOCUMENT 12 FILED 7-24-2017 2 PAGES, PAGE ID 119 APPENDIX N? BECAUSE U. S. D. C.-MDF-TD CLERK FAILED TO COMPLETE, PROCESS AND ISSUE/EXECUTE ON 8-10-2017 AO440 SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION (8) EIGHT SUMMONS RULE 26 SENT TO CLERK BY PLAINTIFF AND 4 FED. R. CIV. P.

• DID TRIAL/ARTICLE 3 COURT-U. S. DISTRICT COURT-MDF-TD ERROR TO DENY PLAINTIFF MOTION FOR WAIVER OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE..? LOCAL RULE 3.05 (c) (2) (b) OR (c) (3) (a); AND RULE 26 FED. R. CIV. P.; LOCAL RULE 1.03 (e) M. D. FLA.; AND TO ADOPT DOCUMENT 13 FILED 8-14-2017 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPENDIX "L"?

• DID ARTICLE 3 COURT-U. S. DISTRICT COURT-MDF-TD ERROR IN DENYING/ADOPTING PLAINTIFF 'S OBJECTION TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION? ON 10-27 AND 30-2017? APPENDIX J.

• DID ARTICLE 3 COURT MISSTEP, OVERLOOK A POST OF BOND? AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX I?

• DID ARTICLE 3 COURT ERROR IN CLAIMING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AS MERITLESS AND WAS PLAINTIFF SURETY BOND/PROMISSORY NOTE RELEVANT? TO TRUMP IFP STATUS, PLRA STATUS AS THE CASE STARTED IN 2000 AS 8:2000-

Question Presented (AI Summary)

DOES the First Amendment protect the right of a public school to discipline a student for off-campus speech that does not cause a substantial disruption at school?

Docket Entries

2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-06
Waiver of right of respondents HUD, et al. to respond filed.
2019-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Elijah Jackson
Elijah Jackson Jr. — Petitioner
HUD, et al.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent