No. 19-7558

Freddie Lee Wilson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection jurisdiction question-not-identified standing takings
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Is it the Unites States Supreme Court's duty to ensure that all United States Constitutional provided rights are protected when they are previously denied as a result of the unconstitutional performance of their defense counsel?

2) As is it deemed constitutionally efficient for criminal defense counsels to not obtain a medical examiner to examine evidence on behalf of defense, even more so in homicide cases whose analysis is of varying opinion?

3) As envisioned by the United States Constitution Amendment Six (6), is it deemed constitutionally efficient for criminal defense Counsels to omit defenses from the accused, resulting in no defense at all for their client?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-17
Waiver of right of respondent Mark S. Inch to respond filed.
2019-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2020)

Attorneys

Freddie Wilson
Freddie Lee Wilson — Petitioner
Mark S. Inch
Jonathan TanoosFlorida Office of the Attorney General, Respondent