1. In Blake v Ross, 1365.Ct. 185o, Did The United states Supreme Coort Eliminate The Requirement For An Individualized, Fact Specific petermination Regarding The Avallability of Ad ministrative Remedies?

2. Is An Administrative Remedy Available To A Mentally Handicapped Prisoner When The De partment of Correltion Falls To Provide Assistance Mandated By It's Own Administrative Directive?

3. Are The De partment of Corrections staff Required To Assist Impairedor Disabled Inmates To Ensure Administrative Remodies Ave "Accessible" And "Capable of Use" For The Prisoner To "Obtain Relief"?

4. Is An Inmate Required To Present"Expert Witness Evidence" On His Mental Condition When He Pointed To His Treatment Records At The Prlson, In order To survive A Motion For summary dudgment?

Whether the Supreme Court should eliminate the requirement for an individualized, fact-specific determination regarding the availability of administrative remedies?