Wheather the decision. bot the United States CouRt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circnit in LAwson √. Secratary Department of Corrections, Docket No. 17-14802 is in conflict with the Law st forth iN LafkR v. Cooper 123 S.C+ 1376 (43 2012 (were the prejudice test set forth in "Lafler" was mis applied to Lawsons Unique CircumstANces) ?

Wheather Lawsors ple prouess was prejudiced were he entered ple Negotiatiols on three felony offeuses, two of wich were barred from prosecution by law, and Further counsels mis-advice that 1o counsts two and three were (Not) barred from prosecution boy the Statut of limatations 2. The only way to prevail on counts. two and three was to proceed to trirtf and 3. That scone sheet enteRing Negotious was valid. ( The record reflects that petitioner and the State were amnicable to ple Negotiations as there

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing petitioner's civil rights claims alleging due process and equal protection violations related to his prison disciplinary proceedings