No. 19-752
Hawaii Management Alliance Association v. Randy Rudel
Response Waived
Tags: adjudicatory-procedure administrative-law civil-enforcement civil-procedure erisa erisa-preemption federal-jurisdiction federal-preemption federal-regulation preemption state-law state-statutes statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
If state statutes create an adjudicatory procedure that is contrary to the exclusive civil enforcement mechanism under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), can they provide the "relevant rule of decision" in an action brought under 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (ERISA § 502(a))?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether state statutes can provide the 'relevant rule of decision' in an ERISA § 502(a) action when the state statutes create an adjudicatory procedure contrary to ERISA's exclusive civil enforcement mechanism
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent Randy Rudel to respond filed.
2019-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Hawaii Management Alliance Association
Jordon Jun Kimura — McCoriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP, Petitioner
Randy Rudel
Allen Kenneth Williams — Trecker Fritz & Williams, Respondent