No. 19-7514

Ekanem Kurfreobon Essien v. Suzanne M. Peery, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-street-gang due-process habeas-corpus ninth-circuit-review reasonable-doubt sentencing-enhancement street-terrorism-enforcement-and-prevention-act sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it denied petitioner Ekanem Kufreobon Essien's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition based on its conclusion that his constitutional right to have every element proven beyond a reasonable doubt was not violated by the imposition of the California gang enhancement at sentencing, where the evidence was insufficient to establish: (1) the existence of a criminal street gang within the meaning of the Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act, Cal. Penal Code § 186.22; and (2) that petitioner acted in association with that same criminal street gang.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying petitioner's habeas petition

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent Suzanne M. Peery to respond filed.
2020-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)

Attorneys

Ekanem Essien
Mara Kapelovitz GoldmanFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Suzanne M. Peery
David M. BaskindCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent