Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Did the court of appeals deprive the Petitioners of due process of law by giving binding precedential weight to a prior panel's expedited and unappealable order issued under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 without counsel, argument, or adversarial testing?
II. Should this Court exercise its supervisory authority over the federal courts to hold that a prior order on an ex parte motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 cannot bind a subsequent panel in an adversarial proceeding?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Alabama robbery categorically requires 'as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i) and U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1)
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, respecting the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in St. Hubert v. United States, 590 U. S. ___ (2020) (Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari).
2020-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-04-15
Reply of petitioners David Hunt, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-01
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-03-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2020.
2020-03-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2020 to April 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)