Paul Edward Duran v. Ralph Diaz, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
CriminalProcedure
1) Whether the Circumstances regarding the Founth Amendment Exslusionary Rule 20.08, thatis revolved around the obtaining, holding and exclusion of evidence in the Criminal Conviction Case # BA.41s-427, Consist of the future empirical evidance and or data thatis required to undermine the Courts assumtions made in [Illinois V. Krul1,480 U45.,353-354.11987)] and. Illnited States V. Leon. 468 Us at 916n.14at 927-928 l1984)].inorder t0 revise the U.S. Supreme Counts Conclusions accordingly.
Whether the Circumstances regarding the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule § 2010F not evolved around the obtaining, holding and exclusion of evidence in the Criminal Conviction Case v. BA-HIS-HAT, consist of the future empirical evidence and/or data that is required to undermine the Court's assumptions made in Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 (1987) and United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), in order to revise the U.S. Supreme Court's conclusions accordingly