Douglas Edwin Ball, Jr. v. Michigan
Arbitration
% - '^eTxTXctJEE' ? Dkt T&cceiz? iZx&Hvz uvfrsF- The Tv\>FTetoJTH
4^fwMiSvr hbf'E\ZXoC4TtO B>ECAr 1/5£T -Z~5 -2^W (p<s>5'5jr&^£' TO
TAETFRM^tj & IaJHeTHe FL THE vEFceec -t ws Ua/AHF~ Me w^> h/HefF
1HEEE T*, Ttf50 FFTc-Ta/o T S^FToEucE ToTuYpc/!~T~ ~THt CZcnmtcttc H
Yog "7'ogivp'g AhO THE THfau (EEov&t ALLc^EO The: TuFY To
PcTi/^W y4 \Z££OT ot of LTY To FT^r Pe^flSB MoAbEtZ FF
They FT mo Ffthef 'The^ eo^tated m^foe^- o/z. Felony Foiibe^.
JT~ The If-tau FHwe t £P-iZ-E® TH AOMXrr^oyE bn A B^O b/vce Foo a/£>
OF 5>H oFT^ WopW BY TcTXTSosvEfZ Tie OAT THE VTCrr^y
MT55T h& \JHef-e The 'Thos£c<,T^Aj£ Attof^e y <tawv T Establish
/4 CHajt/o- oF <F\jst&/> y op. Lay A Fouuc >atmo .-v That ~ h/co LP)
TkF (Fc'ofl'X TO AT HO £/£ o5S CZ& ajTAM.3 =HA~TX~ o,\/
BPCCuZHLEV AnE> AOMT^szzorS oF THE £vEi>Eo/CE
UAP-M L £<55 6F(Z& t.2..U/£*JT
UA5> Ho T
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment was violated because it is impossible to determine whether the verdict was unanimous where there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction