No. 19-7475

Douglas Edwin Ball, Jr. v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2020-01-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appeal civil-rights conviction dna-evidence due-process evidence insufficient-evidence jury jury-instructions unanimous-verdict
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2020-03-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

% - '^eTxTXctJEE' ? Dkt T&cceiz? iZx&Hvz uvfrsF- The Tv\>FTetoJTH
4^fwMiSvr hbf'E\ZXoC4TtO B>ECAr 1/5£T -Z~5 -2^W (p<s>5'5jr&^£' TO
TAETFRM^tj & IaJHeTHe FL THE vEFceec -t ws Ua/AHF~ Me w^> h/HefF
1HEEE T*, Ttf50 FFTc-Ta/o T S^FToEucE ToTuYpc/!~T~ ~THt CZcnmtcttc H
Yog "7'ogivp'g AhO THE THfau (EEov&t ALLc^EO The: TuFY To
PcTi/^W y4 \Z££OT ot of LTY To FT^r Pe^flSB MoAbEtZ FF
They FT mo Ffthef 'The^ eo^tated m^foe^- o/z. Felony Foiibe^.
JT~ The If-tau FHwe t £P-iZ-E® TH AOMXrr^oyE bn A B^O b/vce Foo a/£>
OF 5>H oFT^ WopW BY TcTXTSosvEfZ Tie OAT THE VTCrr^y
MT55T h& \JHef-e The 'Thos£c<,T^Aj£ Attof^e y <tawv T Establish
/4 CHajt/o- oF <F\jst&/> y op. Lay A Fouuc >atmo .-v That ~ h/co LP)
TkF (Fc'ofl'X TO AT HO £/£ o5S CZ& ajTAM.3 =HA~TX~ o,\/
BPCCuZHLEV AnE> AOMT^szzorS oF THE £vEi>Eo/CE
UAP-M L £<55 6F(Z& t.2..U/£*JT
UA5> Ho T

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment was violated because it is impossible to determine whether the verdict was unanimous where there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction

Docket Entries

2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Douglas E. Ball, Jr.
Douglas Edwin Ball Jr. — Petitioner