Did the Appeals Court conduct a full review of the record submitted to the panel on December 2, 2019 prior to the Per Curiam opinion issued one day later on December 3, 2019?

Was the lower court record reviewed in the light most favorable to Petitioner Essex Ins. Co. v. Barrett Moving & Storage, Inc., 885 F.3d 1292, 1299 (11th Cir. 2018)?

Did the Petitioner establish prima facie and casual connections between her protected activities and adverse actions by both sets of Respondents reviewed and ruled on?

Did Respondents provide non-discriminatory or non-retaliatory reasons for their nine adverse actions against Petitioner after Judge Legrome Davis ' ruling that prima fecie was established?

Did Robert Kline, an Accountant and unpaid member of the Pennsylvania Senate Democratic Caucus have legal authority to terminate Petitioner?

Was there a causal connection between Petitioner 's email on September 11, 2014 and her termination by Robert Kline on September 12, 2014?

Did Petitioner 's termination follow Pennsylvania Senate termination policies?

Did Petitioner 's termination follow PA Senate policies and procedures?

Were reasonable comparators offered by Petitioner reviewed? And was Petitioner treated in the same manner?

Did the Appeals Court conduct a full review of the record submitted to the panel?