1. Is OLONOVOR V. DONALDSON, 422 US. [?] a Valid Legal Precedent for Due Process?

2. Is FOURIER V. LOUISIANA, 504 US. 71 77-1780 (1992) still Valid?

3. If the Answer is yes to the above Questions, then why do the Lower Courts in the California PC, Section 1026 refuse to ABIDE BY these Important US. Supreme Court DECISIONS?

4. Is the ARB. 1026 at the VENUE as written in ANY WAY, Like, optional Out Patient Appointment, A Doctor Recommending Creditor Release of a Patient etc.?

5. If the Answer is yes to #2 or #2, then is the Writ with "Out-of-County Outpatient" Concept Problem Requirement in the CA LD. 1026 Law, a Violation of the Supreme Court Article VI Clause 2?

6. If the Answer is yes to any of the Above, then is Not Federal Preemption Proper for?

7. Is it Not Unconstitutional to Keep by NGI Acquitted Hospitalized when they Are Not Mentally Ill?

8. Is it Not Unconstitutional to Keep an NGI Acquitted Hospitalized on Force them to go to Out Patient when they ARE NOT a Danger to THEMSELVES OR OTHERS & CAPABLE of Living BY THEMSELVES or with the AID of Responsible Family or FRIENDS?

9. Is it Not Cruel & Unusual Punishment & OR Violation to keep an NGI Acquitted Criminally Hospitalized AFTER FULFILLED A Defense Recommendation?

10. For all people Citizens interested style in Supreme Court PLEASE clarify the EXACT Legal BASIS FOR Continued Hospitalization?

11. Will the U.S. Supreme Court Please Clarify the EXACT Legal BASIS FOR Straight Release Procedure to sever LA?

12. Is THERE Any Overlook Constitutional Bug or Necessary Vicious Why CRs?

13. Will the U.S. Supreme Court PLEASE Clarify if Straight Release, SINCE DR. SHLHAL HAS RECOMMENDED this SINCE 2015?

14. Will the U.S. Supreme Court please Use my CASE to SET a new Legal Precedent—Equally put A CAP on the UNLIMITED Unconstitutional Hospitalization Problem?

15. Is California or ANY OTHER State, Corporation or Person, ABOVE the U.S. Constitution or U.S. Supreme Court DECISIONS?

Whether the involuntary civil commitment of a non-dangerous individual violates due process and the Eighth Amendment