Question/Issue No.l: Isthe juckgment of the
because the habeas petitiower's State
hebeas proceralie

Question/Issue No.2: Did the United Stctes Distriet
Coust commit aneror in law whes it graoted the
Respovclent's moton for Summory Judgment upon a matenel
fact issue id dispute.

Questow/Issue No. 3: Did the Uuited stots District
Coust commit anerror islaw when it accorded the
presumption of coorectwess to the Stete court's legal
constitutonel rights to effeche assustavce of cousel?

QuestionlIssue No. 4! Is a CnmilDefesclent
depruved of hisor her constitutinalrights to Dae Process
Uucter thelTh Amevelmt ta the Urited Stat Coustitutin
appllate reuiew wheu a Court Appeals fails ts aderess

the specitc issue presetecs fora certificate of oppecletility?

Question/Issue No.S:Isa CrimivalDefewclont
deprued of his covstitutional rights to effectie assistonee
f couvsel uucler the 6TH Amenclment to the Usited States
have a fim commavd of the facks of the case as wells
goverviog law; end fails to educate himselt as to the
the States expert wituessi

Whether the United States District Court erred in dismissing a pro se habeas corpus petition due to the lack of jurisdiction because the habeas per petitioner's state habeas proceedings were still ongoing before the state habeas court