I
WHEN A JURY FOUND SINGLETON GUILTY OF COUNT 10 OF
THE IMDICTMENT, WHICH ALLEGED THAT HE DISTRIBUTED "ULTRAM ";
HOW CAN IT BE DETERMINED THAT THE JURY DID NOT RELY
ON "ULTRAM " IN FINDING HIM GUILTY, OF MONEY LAUNDERING
THE PROCEEDS FROM DISTRIBUTING ULTRAM, OXYCODONE, AND
DIAZEPAM WHEN A GENERAL VERDICT FORM WAS USED? AFTER
TRIAL, ULTRAM WAS DETERMINED NOT TO BE ON THE FEDERAL
DRUG SCHEDULES AND THEREFORE NOT A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL
CODES.

II
DID THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATE BRADY V.
MARYLAND WHEN THEY REFUSED TO RELEASE 34 C.I.
DEBRIEFING VIDEOS, WHICH WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED
SINGLETON 'S THOERY OF DEFENSE, I.E., THAT HE
WAS OPERATING A LEGITIMATE MEDICAL PAIN
CLINIC?

III
DID THE PETITIONER RECEIVE INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, WHEN COUNSEL FAILED
TO OBTAIN COPIES OF THE COMPUTER HARD-DRIVES,
WHICH CONTAINED SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE THAT WOULD
HAVE SUPPORTED SINGLETON 'S THEORY OF DEFENSE AND
DISPROVED THE GOVERNMENT 'S THEORY OF PROSECUTION?

Whether the jury relied on an invalid conviction for distributing Ultram in finding the defendant guilty of money laundering