No. 19-7357

Chris Fordham v. Corrections Officer Manzola, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence exhaustion-doctrine exhaustion-of-remedies fourth-circuit judicial-procedure procedural-dismissal section-1983 standing
Latest Conference: 2020-02-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the USDO-EDAO erred in deciding that Plaintiff-Petitioner failed to exhaust and dismissing without prejudice the Petitioner's §1982 Complaint after the Petitioner attempted to exhaust all administrative remedies.

Whether the Fourth Circuit Court erred in dismissing the §1983 Complaint without prejudice after the Petitioner presented the COA with prior existing and credible evidence that was unavailable to present to the District Court and which showed Petitioner repeatedly attempted to exhaust administrative remedies.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the USDC-EDAO erred in deciding that Plaintiff-Petitioner failed to exhaust and dismissing without prejudice Petitioner's § 1982 Complaint after Petitioner's exhausted all administrative remedies

Docket Entries

2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-06
Waiver of right of respondents Corrections Officer Manzola, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Chris Fordham
Chris Fordham — Petitioner
Corrections Officer Manzola, et al.
Matthew W. Sawchak — Respondent