(1). WHETHER FINAL JUDGMENT DENYING PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS WAS APPEALABLE

(2). WHETHER ORDER DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL TO INMATES FUSED CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED HIS INABILITY TO AFFORD COUNSEL WERE DIRECTLY APPEALABLE

(3). WHETHER PETITIONER SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SHOW IN CASE RECORDS THAT CONVICTION AND SENTENCE IN STATE COURT SHOULD BE SET ASIDE ON THE GROUNDS HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL HAD BEEN VIOLATED AND STATE APPELLATE COURT VIOLATED THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANDERS V. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.CT. 1396, 18 L.ED 2D 493 (1967)

(4). WHETHER PETITIONER'S CASE NOT FOLLOWED ON STATE LAW GROUNDS

(5). WHETHER A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE DID OCCUR(ED), WHEREIN THE RECORDS SHOW THE WRIT WAS WISHED ON CHARGES THAT WERE DISMISSED

(6). WHETHER PETITIONER WAS ENTITLED TO EVIDENTIARY HEARING WHEN COURT APPOINTED PRIVATE COUNSEL SUBMITTED HIS NO-MERIT FORCE WITHOUT HIS CLIENT'S CONSENT, NOT KNOWING COUNSEL TOLD THE STATE APPELLATE COURT HIS CLIENT CONSENTED TO CAPITOL MURDER

(7). WHETHER STATE COURT VIOLATED A.C.A. 3 16-A-202

(8). WHETHER ISSUES OF PERJURY AND PROSECUTOR MISCONDUCT DO EXIST THAT WARRANT AN HEARING

Whether state court violated A.C.A. 5-10-202