No. 19-7349
Angel Osornio v. Supreme Court of the United States, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection fair-trial impartial-tribunal judicial-review standing
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Dwhy am I a lake
Staks Chan ic
het bee protecte
under the constifthn?
2
the Wrino Staks?
Worl
ere my
e th a
the
dunt fake the menty of
anπ
casl
h
Seriwsly
fain n croma prosecwtion?
have not proceded
that they
15 Liase?
⑤Why
have they
allowe
a person to
Ingure me or purson ) wro have
intnf to Do
act?
Iomy
① What constitoley a crine
the Carf?
Coropt?
our
So
gooing to do whats Rignt?
hin
Some
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner was unlawfully denied due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment when the state court proceedings failed to provide a fair and impartial tribunal to adjudicate the petitioner's claims
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-04-06
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-20
Waiver of right of respondents Supreme Court of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
2019-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Angel Osornio
Angel Osornio — Petitioner
Supreme Court of the United States, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent