No. 19-7335
Chad Prodoehl v. United States
Tags: conspiracy criminal-law drug-conspiracy drug-crimes drug-trafficking due-process inchoate-offense inchoate-offenses overt-act sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
As statutorily defined, violating 21 U.S.C. § 846 is an inchoate offense, as it requires no overt act, but is complete upon the agreement. Because of this, can a "results in death" (as found in the penalty provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841) statutory enhancement apply? Alternatively, if a "results in death" enhancement can apply to a 21 U.S.C. § 846 conspiracy, must that element be agreed upon by the conspirators?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a 'results in death' statutory enhancement can apply to a 21 U.S.C. § 846 conspiracy offense, and if so, whether that element must be agreed upon by the conspirators
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Chad Prodoehl
Kevin Michael Schad — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent