No. 19-7331
Lavorice Dondrell Cunningham v. United States
Tags: appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-discretion legal-standard pending-resolution remand sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. What is the appropriate standard for the determination of substantive reasonableness claim?
SUB SIDIARY QUESTI ON: Whether the Court should hold the case pending the resolution of Holguin-Hernandez v. United States , No. 18-7739, __U.S.__, 139 S.Ct 266 (June 3, 2019)(g ranting certiorari), and potentially grant certiorari , vacate the judgment below, and remand in light of that case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the appropriate standard for the determination of substantive reasonableness claim?
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Lavorice Dondrell Cunningham
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent