(1) Whether The United States Supreme Court, Will review The Evidence In this Case and recognize and
Acknowlege That The Respondent, The United States Of America,doing busineess as Department Of
Health and Human Services; ALEX M. AZAR II,Secretary,U.S. Department of Health And Human Services,
as being in Authority and Leadership Over the Control of Laws and Regulations in enforcing the compliances
In the Performances of these Health Departments And Laboratories as well as for the unauthorized Hospitals
non-regulatory and non-compliance in human Experimentation without a Patient Informed Consent, among
Other existing performances such as the deliberate withholding of an investigation into the Misconduct of these
Public Entities and Others under the control of the U.S.HHS.with its Departments in charge of these Unlawful
Improper Governmental Activities.

(2). Whether jhe United States Supreme Court will Consider the i/19/15, letter to the Petitioner, from the
United States DOJ, Disability Rights Section.civil rights Division, In reference to [CTS# 501104, regarding the
Georgia Department Of Human Resources,Et.AL,Atlanta, Georgia, received by DOJ on September 30,2014 .and
the CMS, Letter to me from Director Karen Dyer,of the Division of Clinical Laboratory Improvement and Quality.,
and from the HHSC PHR 2/3 Civil Rights Office , Dr. James Zoretic, Regional Medical Director,DSHS-Public
Health Region 2/3., and from Texas HHSC OIG Deputy Quinton Arnold, who all review this Evidence and states
That this is more appropriately addressed by the U.S.HHS, who have constantly ignored each and every
Complaints made by the Petitioner in regards to these incidents and misconducts of Improper acts and the withholding
of Medical Information, inorder to Protect and help cover up wrong doings by joining in with those that are under.
U.S.HHS, and Its OCR even states in a E-Mail that there is no HIV/AIDS OFFICE WITHIN HHS that would investigate
my allegations

(3).Whether The U.S, Supreme court will recognize, acknowledge and consider after review of a!! Documents that
the Plaintiff, Appellant, Petitioner Complainst and court filing and requested Mandamus are not (FRIVOLOUS),
and that the Facts in this case are not baseless and the Evidence Prove it.

(4). Whether, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas and whether
and Whether the United States Courts of Appeals For the Fifth Circuit and Bias toward the Plaintiff, Appellant
In their Judgements in dismissing the Evidence Put before the Courts because of the Defendants and
Appellees are the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the courts magistrates, Judges are employees of the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

(5).Whether, the Petitioner will get any fair Judgement based on the United States court systems when it
comes to them seeing these wrongs being committed as it agencies, Departments, courts, doing business as
The United States Of America

Whether The United States Supreme Court will recognize, acknowledge, and consider the Fact that a Mandamus
Action is warranted for such Exceptional and Extraordinary Circumstances as this.

Whether the United States Supreme Court will review the evidence in this case and recognize and acknowledge that the respondent, the United States of America, doing business as Department of Health and Human Services, is in authority and leadership over the control of laws and regulations in enforcing the compliances