No. 19-7319
Thomas Bradford Waters v. John Stewart, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims due-process evidentiary-standards excessive-force free-speech judicial-interpretation legal-procedure procedural-review qualified-immunity standing summary-judgment takings
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, despite the plaintiff's claims that there were genuine issues of material facts as to the 'quantity' of force used and the 'circumstances' under which the force was used
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-09-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-04-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-07
Waiver of right of respondents John Stewart and Mark Strickland to respond filed.
2019-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 18, 2020)
Attorneys
John Stewart and Mark Strickland
Lisa A. Thomas — Thompson & Henry, PA, Respondent
Thomas Waters
Thomas Waters — Petitioner