No. 19-7306

Dmitry Pronin v. Charles Wright, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-01-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 4th-circuit appellate-review civil-rights credibility district-court due-process legal-construction procedural-interpretation standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. May an United States District Judge construe legal argument for a party in a civil rights lawsuit, an argument that we forty itself never wisely in a

(2) Did Honorable Henry R Herlono arwronf for Sheriff Chwto l/nfiM, We H'!Yi.KvVivl ?

(3) Can circumstantial evidence create an issue of materially lowering summary judgment

(4) Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit remission of law in District Court to assess credibility on a summary judgment motion and to decide implied factly. Construe such in Urbh mi L

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court properly construed the legal argument for a party in a civil rights lawsuit, and whether the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals improperly allowed the district court to discount credibility on summary judgment

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-14
Brief of respondent Charles Wright, Neal Urch and L. Blackwell in opposition filed.
2020-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2020)

Attorneys

Charles Wright, Neal Urch and L. Blackwell
Anne Ross CulbreathWillson Jones Carter and Baxley, Respondent
Dmitry Pronin
Dmitry Pronin — Petitioner