No. 19-7304
Anthony Michael Salazar v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: case-law certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure-appeal due-process habeas-corpus illegal-sentence incarceration judicial-review sentencing sentencing-error united-states-v-haymond
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
The Court of Appeals erred in denying a Certificate of Appealability when Petitioner is incarcerated on an illegally-imposed sentence in light of United States v. Haymond.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying a Certificate of Appealability when the Petitioner is incarcerated on an illegally-imposed sentence in light of United States v. Haymond
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 18, 2020)
Attorneys
Anthony Michael Salazar
Anthony Michael Salazar — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent